Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with zoledronic acid for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in patients with autoimmune diseases.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the preference, patient satisfaction, and efficacy of zoledronic acid compared with oral bisphosphonates (BPs) for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) in patients with autoimmune diseases. METHODS: We enrolled 50 patients with new fractures or osteoporosis detected on follow-up bone densitometry after at least 1 year of oral BP use among patients diagnosed with GIOP during treatment for autoimmune diseases. After 1 year of zoledronic acid treatment, patients completed a survey for preference and satisfaction assessment. Treatment efficacy was analysed by comparing bone mineral density changes and fractures with those in a control group of patients who continued oral BP use. RESULTS: Age, sex, treatment duration, and medication history did not differ significantly between the two groups. Among the participants, 86.7% preferred and were more satisfied with intravenous zoledronic acid than with oral BPs, primarily because of the convenience of its administration interval. Only two patients (4%) reported infusion-related adverse events with zoledronic acid. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in the annualized percentage change in the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femur neck, and hip between patients receiving zoledronic acid and those receiving oral BPs. The occurrence of new fractures was consistent across both groups, with two cases in each, showing no significant differences. CONCLUSION: Patients showed a preference for and greater satisfaction with zoledronic acid, and its efficacy in treating osteoporosis was comparable to that of oral BPs. Therefore, zoledronic acid is a suitable treatment option for GIOP in patients with autoimmune diseases.

Peri-implantitis increases the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with osseointegrated implants in rats treated with zoledronate.

This study evaluated the peri-implant tissues under normal conditions and under the influence of experimental peri-implantitis (EPI) in osseointegrated implants installed in the maxillae of rats treated with oncologic dosage of zoledronate. Twenty-eight senescent female rats underwent the extraction of the upper incisor and placement of a titanium dental implant (DI). After eight weeks was installated a transmucosal healing screw on DI. After nine weeks, the following groups were formed: VEH, ZOL, VEH-EPI and ZOL-EPI. From the 9th until the 19th, VEH and VEH-EPI groups received vehicle and ZOL and ZOL-EPI groups received zoledronate. At the 14th week, a cotton ligature was installed around the DI in VEH-EPI and ZOL-EPI groups to induce the EPI. At the 19th week, euthanasia was performed, and the maxillae were processed so that at the implanted sites were analyzed: histological aspects and the percentage of total bone tissue (PTBT) and non-vital bone tissue (PNVBT), along with TNFα, IL-1ß, VEGF, OCN and TRAP immunolabeling. ZOL group presented mild persistent peri-implant inflammation, higher PNVBT and TNFα and IL-1ß immunolabeling, but lower for VEGF, OCN and TRAP in comparison with VEH group. ZOL-EPI group exhibited exuberant peri-implant inflammation, higher PNVBT and TNFα and IL-1ß immunolabeling when compared with ZOL and VEH-EPI groups. Zoledronate disrupted peri-implant environment, causing mild persistent inflammation and increasing the quantity of non-vital bone tissue. Besides, associated with the EPI there were an exacerbated inflammation and even greater increase in the quantity of non-vital bone around the DI, which makes this condition a risk factor for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws.

Cardiovascular safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of primary osteoporosis: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is intimately linked to cardiovascular disease and it has been uncertain that zoledronic acid is not correlated with cardiovascular disease. We intended to assess the cardiovascular safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of primary osteoporosis. METHODS: We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with osteoporosis receiving zoledronic acid or a placebo. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP from the time of database creation to April 5, 2023. Two investigators extracted data independently on study characteristics, outcomes of interest, and risk of bias based on PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: As of April 5, 2023, our search identified 32,361 records, and after excluding these records, 9 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The overall risk ratio for cardiovascular events with zoledronic acid for primary osteoporosis compared with placebo was 1.15 (95 % CI 1.05-1.26, I2=12 %, P = 0.002), while the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events with zoledronic acid (RR 1.03, 95 % CI 0. 89-1.18, I2=21 %, P = 0.71) was not significant, possibly due to atrial fibrillation (RR 1.21, 95 % CI 0.99-1.47, I2=0 %, P = 0.06) versus the increased relative risk of arrhythmia (RR 1.30, 95 % CI 1.11-1.52, I2=34 %, P = 0.001). Overall, the cardiovascular risk of zoledronic acid for the treatment of primary osteoporosis was not significant; however, the relative risk of elevated atrial fibrillation and arrhythmias remains to be further studied. CONCLUSIONS: In women with primary osteoporosis, zoledronic acid may increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (P = 0.06) and arrhythmias (P = 0.001) compared with placebo, independent of the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, angina, and heart failure. However, the sample size of men with primary osteoporosis is small, and the cardiovascular risk of zoledronic acid in men with osteoporosis is uncertain.

Rodents as an animal model for studying tooth extraction-related medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: assessment of outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of several rodent animal models for studying tooth extraction-related medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). DESIGN: After a search of the databases, 2004 articles were located, and 118 corroborated the inclusion factors (in vivo studies in rodents evaluating tooth extraction as a risk factor for the development of MRONJ). RESULTS: Numerous studies attempting to establish an optimal protocol to induce MRONJ were found. Zoledronic acid (ZA) was the most used drug, followed by alendronate (ALN). Even when ZA did not lead to the development of MRONJ, its effect compromised the homeostasis of the bone and soft tissue. The association of other risk factors (dexamethasone, diabetes, and tooth-related inflammatory dental disease) besides tooth extraction also played a role in the development of MRONJ. In addition, studies demonstrated a relationship between cumulative dose and MRONJ. CONCLUSIONS: Both ZA and ALN can lead to MRONJ in rodents when equivalent human doses (in osteoporosis or cancer treatment) are used. Local oral risk factors and tooth-related inflammatory dental disease increase the incidence of MRONJ in a tooth extraction-related rodent model.

Prediction of musculoskeletal pain after the first intravenous zoledronic acid injection in patients with primary osteoporosis: development and evaluation of a new nomogram.

OBJECTIVE: To construct a new prediction nomogram to predict the risk of musculoskeletal pain in patients with primary osteoporosis who receive zoledronic acid intravenously for the first time. METHOD: Clinical data of 368 patients with primary osteoporosis who received the first intravenous injection of zoledronic acid in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2022 were studied. Patients were divided into a musculoskeletal pain group (n = 258) and a non-musculoskeletal pain group (n = 110) based on the presence or absence of musculoskeletal pain 3 days after injection. Statistically significant predictors were screened by logistic regression analysis and the minimum absolute contraction and selection operator (LASSO) to construct a nomogram. The nomogram was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the calibration curve, the C-index, and the decision curve analysis (DCA) and verified in a validation cohort. RESULTS: The independent predictors of the nomogram were age, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, NSAIDs, prior Vitamin D intake, and BMI. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.980 (95% CI, 0.915-0.987), showing excellent predictive performance. The nomogram c index was 0.980, and the nomogram c index for internal verification remained high at 0.979. Moreover, calibration curves show that the nomogram has good consistency. Finally, the DCA showed that the net benefit of the nomogram was 0.20-0.49. CONCLUSION: Musculoskeletal pain is a common symptom of APR in OP patients treated with intravenous zoledronic acid. Risk factors for musculoskeletal pain after zoledronic acid injection in OP patients were: non-use of NSAIDs, youth (<80 years old), serum 25 (OH) D<30ng /mL, no prior intake of vitamin D, BMI<24 kg /m2. A nomogram constructed from the above predictors can be used to predict musculoskeletal pain after the first zoledronic acid injection.

Drug efficacy and safety of denosumab, teriparatide, zoledronic acid, and ibandronic acid for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab, teriparatide, zoledronic acid, and ibandronic acid for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane up to April 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using R 4.1.3 software, and quality evaluation was conducted using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: 51 RCTs containing 39,095 patients met our selection criteria. The efficacy results indicated that teriparatide was more effective than ibandronic acid in reducing vertebral fractures [relative risk (RR) = 0.536; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.266, 0.998)]. Denosumab [mean difference (MD) = -4.19; 95% CI (-8.03, -0.355)] and teriparatide [MD = 4.64; 95% CI (1.60, 7.72)] showed better efficacy than ibandronic acid in improving spine bone mineral density (BMD). Denosumab showed better efficacy than teriparatide in improving radius BMD [MD = -4.14; 95% CI (-6.72, -1.54)], hip bone mineral density (BMD) [MD = -2.01; 95% CI (-3.80, -0.162)], and one-third radius BMD [MD = -3.63; 95% CI (-7.04, -0.151)]. Denosumab was associated with the greatest benefit in increasing radius BMD [the surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) = 0.999], hip BMD [surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) = 0.979], femoral neck BMD (SUCRA = 0.971), one-third radius BMD (SUCRA = 0.994) and preventing vertebral fractures (SUCRA = 0.806). Teriparatide was associated with the greatest benefit in preventing non-vertebral fractures (SUCRA = 0.927) and improving spine BMD (SUCRA = 0.899). The safety results indicated that teriparatide was safer than zoledronic acid regarding the risk of adverse events [RR = 0.958; 95% CI (0.919, 0.988)]. Teriparatide was associated with the greatest benefit in preventing adverse events (SUCRA = 0.908) and serious adverse events (SUCRA = 0.813). CONCLUSIONS: Our current results suggested that when considering both safety and efficacy, denosumab or teriparatide might be a better choice for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Correlations between Immune Response and Etiopathogenic Factors of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Cancer Patients Treated with Zoledronic Acid.

Impairment of the immune response in MRONJ (medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws) is one of the still unclear etiopathogenic mechanisms of this condition encountered in cancer patients treated with bisphosphonates, with negative effects on the patient's quality of life. The aim of the present study was to correlate the immune response with etiopathogenic factors via immunohistochemical evaluation of the maxillary tissues in zoledronic acid osteonecrosis. The retrospective study included a group of 51 patients with various types of cancers, diagnosed with stage 2 or 3 MRONJ at zoledronic acid and treated surgically. Immunohistochemical expressions of αSMA, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD79α, CD68, CD204, and tryptase were evaluated. Immunohistochemical markers expressions were statistically analyzed according to the duration of the treatment, the trigger factor, the location of the MRONJ, and the healing status. Analysis of the immune response included T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages, and mast cells. The duration of treatment significantly influenced the immunohistochemical expression of most markers (p < 0.05). For an increasing trend in treatment duration, a decreasing trend in marker score was observed, suggesting an inverse correlation. The expression of the markers was different depending on the trigger factor, on MRONJ localization (maxilla/mandible), and the healing status, being more intense in patients cured per primam compared to those who had relapses. The patient's immune response was negatively influenced by the duration of the treatment, the trigger factor, the location of the lesion in the mandible, and the recurrence of MRONJ.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw using periodontitis-induced rat before tooth extraction.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) after tooth extraction due to periodontitis in ovariectomized rats. METHODS: Twenty-four osteoporosis-induced rats were administered with zoledronic acid (ZA; ZA group) or saline (CONT group). In both groups, tooth extraction was performed after inducing periodontitis, and all animals were sacrificed 8-week after tooth extraction. RESULTS: Micro-CT of the tibia showed that the bone volume fraction, bone surface density, trabecular number, and bone mineral density were significantly higher in the ZA group than in the CONT group. Histologically, the proliferative zone on the growth plate was thicker in the ZA group than in the CONT group. Micro-CT of the extraction sites revealed that the bone volume fraction was significantly higher in the ZA group than in the CONT group. Radiologically, the ZA group showed partial healing and delayed healing. Histological analysis revealed normal bone healing status with completely healed epithelium in the extraction sites of the CONT group, whereas abnormal empty osteocytes in the necrotic bone and inflammatory infiltration were observed in the ZA group. CONCLUSION: The incidence of MRONJ increased in the rats administered with ZA.

[Risk Factors of Antiresorptive Agent-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Prostate Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases].

Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) is a severe adverse event associated with use of bone resorption inhibitors (BRIs), such as zoledronic acid and denosumab. Based on the results of phase 3 clinical trials for BRIs, the frequency of ARONJ is reported to be 1 to 2%, but the actual frequency could be higher. We investigated 173 patients with prostate cancer with bone metastases who were treated either with zoledronic acid or denosumab at our hospital between July 2006 and June 2020. ARONJ occurred in 13 patients (8%); i.e., ten out of 159 patients (6%) who were treated with zoledronic acid, and three out of 14 patients (21%) who were treated with denosumab. Multivariate analysis showed that longer duration of BRI exposure and dental treatment before the initiation of BRI are associated with risk of ARONJ. ARONJ is associated with decreased mortality but the association is not significant. Generally, the occurrence of ARONJ may be underestimated; therefore, further studies are warranted to determine the actual frequency of ARONJ.

Zoledronic acid-induced severe lymphopenia.

Although anemia, thrombocytopenia, and mild lymphopenia have been reported in the acute phase response after zoledronic acid, severe lymphopenia has not been reported. This article describes a case of severe lymphopenia following a 5 mg zoledronic acid infusion administered to treat osteoporosis. Zoledronic acid is used to treat osteoporosis, hypercalcemia, Paget's disease, and solid malignancies, including multiple myeloma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. An acute phase response can be seen in 42% of patients after zoledronic acid treatment. Acute phase response may be accompanied by short-term spontaneously recovered anemia, thrombocytopenia, and severe lymphopenia.

Menaquinone-4 prevents medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw through the SIRT1 signaling-mediated inhibition of cellular metabolic stresses-induced osteoblast apoptosis.

Long-term usage of bisphosphonates, especially zoledronic acid (ZA), induces osteogenesis disorders and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients, thereby contributing to the destruction of bone remodeling and the continuous progression of osteonecrosis. Menaquinone-4 (MK-4), a specific vitamin K2 isoform converted by the mevalonate (MVA) pathway in vivo, exerts the promotion of bone formation, whereas ZA administration suppresses this pathway and results in endogenous MK-4 deficiency. However, no study has evaluated whether exogenous MK-4 supplementation can prevent ZA-induced MRONJ. Here we showed that MK-4 pretreatment partially ameliorated mucosal nonunion and bone sequestration among ZA-treated MRONJ mouse models. Moreover, MK-4 promoted bone regeneration and inhibited osteoblast apoptosis in vivo. Consistently, MK-4 downregulated ZA-induced osteoblast apoptosis in MC3T3-E1 cells and suppressed the levels of cellular metabolic stresses, including oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and DNA damage, which were accompanied by elevated sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) expression. Notably, EX527, an inhibitor of the SIRT1 signaling pathway, abolished the inhibitory effects of MK-4 on ZA-induced cell metabolic stresses and osteoblast damage. Combined with experimental evidences from MRONJ mouse models and MC3T3-E1 cells, our findings suggested that MK-4 prevents ZA-induced MRONJ by inhibiting osteoblast apoptosis through suppression of cellular metabolic stresses in a SIRT1-dependent manner. The results provide a novel translational direction for the clinical application of MK-4 for preventing MRONJ.

Zoledronate and osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporosis: incidence and risk factors. Analysis of the French Pharmacovigilance Database.

INTRODUCTION: Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) have been characterized with the use of oral bisphosphonates in osteoporosis and zoledronate in oncology. Uncertainties remain, though, with the occurrence of BRONJ related to the use of zoledronate in osteoporosis. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to estimate the incidence and characterize the risk factors of zoledronate-associated BRONJ in osteoporosis as compared with oral bisphosphonates in real life setting. METHODS: Cases of BRONJ associated with zoledronate, alendronate or risedronate were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database up to 2020. The incidence of BRONJ was estimated as their respective numbers related to cases of BRONJ in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis, over the same period, according to the Medic'AM database. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2020, BRONJ incidence with zoledronate was 9.6/100,000 patient-year (PY), significantly higher than with alendronate (5.1/100,000 PY, P<0.001), and risedronate (2.0/100,000 PY, P<0.001). The number of patients treated with bisphosphonates has steadily decreased by 44.5% over 10 years. Meanwhile, the incidence of BRONJ decreased (5.8/100,000 PY in 2011; 1.5/100,000 in 2020), although a rebound was observed in 2018, including 47.6% of BRONJ following denosumab. Apart from classical risk factors, recent dental cares stood out in more than 40% of BRONJ, and zoledronate had a shorter exposure time than oral bisphosphonates. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-life setting, our data confirm that zoledronate-associated BRONJ in osteoporosis is scarce, seeming slightly more common compared with oral bisphosphonates. We also raise awareness of dental care guidelines and greater vigilance when using bisphosphonates in patients with previous exposure to denosumab.

Chronic Periodontal Infection and Not Iatrogenic Interference Is the Trigger of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Insights from a Large Animal Study (PerioBRONJ Pig Model).

Background and Objectives: Antiresorptive drugs are widely used in osteology and oncology. An important adverse effect of these drugs is medication-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). There is scientific uncertainty about the underlying pathomechanism of MRONJ. A promising theory suspects infectious stimuli and local acidification with adverse effects on osteoclastic activity as crucial steps of MRONJ etiology. Clinical evidence showing a direct association between MRONJ and oral infections, such as periodontitis, without preceding surgical interventions is limited. Large animal models investigating the relationship between periodontitis and MRONJ have not been implemented. It is unclear whether the presence of infectious processes without surgical manipulation can trigger MRONJ. The following research question was formulated: is there a link between chronic oral infectious processes (periodontitis) and the occurrence of MRONJ in the absence of oral surgical procedures? Materials and Methods: A minipig large animal model for bisphosphonate-related ONJ (BRONJ) using 16 Göttingen minipigs divided into 2 groups (intervention/control) was designed and implemented. The intervention group included animals receiving i.v. bisphosphonates (zoledronate, n = 8, 0.05 mg/kg/week: ZOL group). The control group received no antiresorptive drug (n = 8: NON-ZOL group). Periodontitis lesions were induced by established procedures after 3 months of pretreatment (for the maxilla: the creation of an artificial gingival crevice and placement of a periodontal silk suture; for the mandible: the placement of a periodontal silk suture only). The outcomes were evaluated clinically and radiologically for 3 months postoperatively. After euthanasia a detailed histological evaluation was performed. Results: Periodontitis lesions could be induced successfully in all animals (both ZOL and NON-ZOL animals). MRONJ lesions of various stages developed around all periodontitis induction sites in the ZOL animals. The presence of MRONJ and periodontitis was proven clinically, radiologically and histologically. Conclusions: The results of this study provide further evidence that the infectious processes without prior dentoalveolar surgical interventions can trigger MRONJ. Therefore, iatrogenic disruption of the oral mucosa cannot be the decisive step in the pathogenesis of MRONJ.

Anti-angiogenic drug aggravates the degree of anti-resorptive drug-based medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw by impairing the proliferation and migration function of gingival fibroblasts.

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of anti-resorptive or anti-angiogenic drugs in cancer patients with odontogenic infections may lead to medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This study investigated whether anti-angiogenic agents aggravate MRONJ occurrence in anti-resorptive-treated patients. METHODS: The clinical stage and jawbone exposure of MRONJ patients caused by different drug regimens were analyzed to ascertain the aggravation effect of anti-angiogenic drugs on anti-resorptive drug-based MRONJ. Next, a periodontitis mice model was established, and tooth extraction was performed after administering anti-resorptive and/or anti-angiogenic drugs; the imaging and histological change of the extraction socket were observed. Moreover, the cell function of gingival fibroblasts was analyzed after the treatment with anti-resorptive and/or anti-angiogenic drugs in order to evaluate their effect on the gingival tissue healing of the extraction socket. RESULTS: Patients treated with anti-angiogenic and anti-resorptive drugs had an advanced clinical stage and a bigger proportion of necrotic jawbone exposure compared to patients treated with anti-resorptive drugs alone. In vivo study further indicated a greater loss of mucosa tissue coverage above the tooth extraction in mice treated with sunitinib (Suti) + zoledronate (Zole) group (7/10) vs. Zole group (3/10) and Suti group (1/10). Micro-computed tomography (CT) and histological data showed that the new bone formation in the extraction socket was lower in Suti + Zole and Zole groups vs. Suti and control groups. In vitro data showed that the anti-angiogenic drugs had a stronger inhibitory ability on the proliferation and migration function of gingival fibroblasts than anti-resorptive drugs, and the inhibitory effect was obviously enhanced after combining zoledronate and sunitinib. CONCLUSION: Our findings provided support for a synergistic contribution of anti-angiogenic drugs to anti-resorptive drugs-based MRONJ. Importantly, the present study revealed that anti-angiogenic drugs alone do not induce severe MRONJ but aggravate the degree of MRONJ via the enhanced inhibitory function of gingival fibroblasts based on anti-resorptive drugs.

The impact of acute-phase reaction on mortality and re-fracture after zoledronic acid in hospitalized elderly osteoporotic fracture patients.

This study involving 674 elderly osteoporotic fracture (OPF) patients undergoing orthopedic surgery investigated the long-term outcomes of acute phase reaction (APR) after initial zoledronic acid (ZOL). Those who had an APR had a 97% higher risk of mortality and a 73% lower rate of re-fracture than patients who did not. INTRODUCTION: Annual infusion of ZOL efficiently decreases the risk of fracture. A temporary APR, consisting of flu-like symptoms, myalgia, and fever, is frequently observed within 3 days after the first dose. This work aimed to identify whether the occurrence of APR after initial ZOL infusion is a reliable indicator of drug efficacy for mortality and re-fracture in elderly OPF patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. METHODS: This retrospectively observed work was constructed on a database prospectively collected from the Osteoporotic Fracture Registry System of a tertiary level A hospital in China. Six hundred seventy-four patients 50 years old or older with newly identified hip/morphological vertebral OPF who received ZOL for the first time after orthopedic surgery were included in the final analysis. APR was identified as a maximum axillary body temperature greater than 37.3 °C for the first 3 days after ZOL infusion. We utilized models of multivariate Cox proportional hazards to compare the risk of all-cause mortality in OPF patients with APR (APR+) and without APR (APR-). Competing risks regression analysis was used to examine the association between the occurrence of APR and re-fracture when mortality was taken into account. RESULTS: In a fully adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, APR+ patients had a significantly higher risk of death than APR- patients with a hazard ratio [HR] 1.97 (95% CI, 1.09-3.56; P-value = 0.02). Furthermore, in an adjusted competing risk regression analysis, APR+ patients had a significantly reduced risk of re-fracture compared with APR- patients with a sub-distribution HR, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.11-0.70; P-value = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested a potential association between the occurrence of APR and increased mortality risk. An initial dose of ZOL following orthopedic surgery was found to be protective against re-fracture in older patients with OPFs.

Safety and effectiveness of once-yearly zoledronic acid in Japanese osteoporosis patients: three-year post-marketing surveillance.

INTRODUCTION: Zoledronic acid (5 mg; ZOL), a once-yearly bisphosphonate, reduces osteoporotic fractures and increases bone mineral density (BMD). This 3-year post-marketing surveillance examined its real-world safety and effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, observational study included patients who started ZOL for osteoporosis. Data were assessed at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months for safety and effectiveness. Treatment persistence, potentially related factors, and persistence before and after the COVID-19 pandemic started were also investigated. RESULTS: The safety analysis and effectiveness analysis sets included 1406 and 1387 patients, respectively, with mean age of 76.5 years. Adverse reactions (ARs) occurred in 19.35% of patients, with an acute-phase reaction in 10.31, 1.01, and 0.55% after the first, second, and third ZOL infusions. Renal function-related ARs, hypocalcaemia, jaw osteonecrosis, and atypical femoral fracture occurred in 1.71, 0.43, 0.43, and 0.07% of patients, respectively. Three-year cumulative fracture incidences were 4.44% for vertebral, 5.64% for non-vertebral, and 9.56% for clinical fractures. BMD increased by 6.79, 3.14, and 1.78% at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, respectively, after 3-year treatment. Bone turnover markers remained within reference ranges. Treatment persistence was 70.34% over 2 years and 51.71% over 3 years. Male, age ≥ 75 years, no previous medicines for osteoporosis, no concomitant medicines for osteoporosis, and inpatient at the first infusion were related to discontinuation. There was no significant difference in the persistence rate between before and after the COVID-19 pandemic (74.7% vs. 69.9%; p = 0.141). CONCLUSION: This 3-year post-marketing surveillance confirmed the real-world safety and effectiveness of ZOL.

Augmentation of IFN-γ by bone marrow derived immune cells in the presence of severe suppression of IFN-γ in gingivae induced by zoledronic acid and denosumab in Hu-BLT mice model of ONJ.

Introduction: The potential mechanisms governing drug induced osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is not well understood, and is one of the objectives of this study. Thus, we tested the release of IFN-γ within different immune compartments including bone marrow and gingivae upon treatment with zoledronic acid (ZOL) and denosumab which are known to induce ONJ in susceptible individuals. Methods: We used humanized-BLT mouse model for the in-vivo studies reported in this paper. To determine the effects of zoledronic acid and denosumab on IFN-γ secretion and NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity; peripheral blood, bone marrow, spleen and gingiva were obtained after the injection of ZOL and denosumab in mice. Results: Percentages of B cells are much higher in wild-type mice whereas the proportions of immune subsets in humans and reconstituted hu-BLT peripheral-blood are similar. Therefore, hu-BLT mice are preferable model to study human disease, in particular, immune-pathologies induced by ZOL and denosumab. Both agents resulted in a severe suppression of IFN-γ in the gingiva, whereas they heightened the release of IFN-γ and NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity by the BM-derived immune cells. ZOL increased the IFN-γ secretion by the spleen and peripheral blood immune cells, whereas denosumab decreased the release IFN-γ by these cells significantly. Discussion: ZOL and denosumab may likely suppress IFN-γ secretion in gingiva through different mechanisms. In addition, to the suppression of IFN-γ secretion, denosumab mediated effect could in part be due to the decrease in the bone resorptive function of osteoclasts due to the induction of antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity and lysis of osteoclasts, whereas ZOL is able to mediate cell death of osteoclasts directly. Suppression of IFN-gamma in gingiva is largely responsible for the inhibition of immune cell function, leading to dysregulated osteoblastic and osteoclastic activities. Restoration of IFN-gamma in the local microenvironment may result in establishment of homeostatic balance in the gingiva and prevention of osteonecrosis of jaw.

Uveitis, a rare but important complication of adjuvant zoledronic acid for early-stage breast cancer.

Bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid are an important part of adjuvant therapy to reduce the risk of recurrence in early-stage breast cancer. Uveitis remains one of the lesser-known side effects of zoledronic acid; prompt recognition is essential to ensure patients receive appropriate and timely care to help prevent permanent vision loss. We report a case of anterior uveitis in a postmenopausal woman who presented with visual symptoms after receiving the first dose of zoledronic acid. This case report serves to educate and increase awareness of the risk of uveitis in patients who are given zoledronic acid. This is the first and only reported case of zoledronic acid when used in the adjuvant setting for the treatment of breast cancer.